Legal Opinion
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 2012No. A11-1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
Daniel Haugen quit his apartment-management job at Superior Development, Inc., after Superior reduced his weekly hours from 40 to 24. The department of employment and economic development deemed Haugen ineligible for unemployment benefits, but an unemployment law judge (ULJ) disagreed and held that Hau-gen is eligible because he quit his employment for good reason caused by Superior. Superior appeals by certiorari, challenging that holding and arguing that it was unlawfully prohibited from appearing before this court without legal counsel and that the Minnesota statute that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Hickman v. Group Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thao v. Command Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Superior Glass, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Michael Felix v. Caribbean Auto Mart of St. Croix, Inc. and Linus LancaneSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2021
- Pamela Beidel, Relator v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.