Legal Opinion

Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 2015No. A14-1694Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STAUBER, Judge.

In this declaratory-judgment action, petitioners challenge the validity of certain water-quality standard rules promulgated by respondent Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (the MPCA), arguing that the agency failed to comply with statutory rulemaking procedures. We declare the rules valid.

FACTS

This is a declaratory-judgment action brought under Minn.Stat. § 14.44 (2014). The petitioners include Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board (MESERB), Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities (CGMC), League of Minnesota Cities (League), and Minnesota Soybean…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Public Citizen, Inc., Aviation Consumer Action Project, and Families of Pan-Am 103/lockerbie v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API