Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge*
In this pre-enforcement declaratory judgment challenge to an administrative rule regulating fishing on Mille Lacs Lake, petitioners assert that the rule is invalid because: (1) the administrative record does not reference or discuss the relevance of article XIII, section 12, of the Minnesota Constitution (the Preservation Provision) or the public-trust doctrine, and (2) the rule is beyond the authority of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (the DNR) under Minn.Stat. § 14.69 (2014). We declare the rule valid against these challenges.
FACTS
Petitioners have brought…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. Longyear Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Builders Association of the Twin Cities v. Minnesota Department of Labor and IndustryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019