Legal Opinion
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1991No. C1-90-1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce seeks a declaratory judgment from this court under Minn.Stat. § 14.44 (1990). The Chamber argues that in adopting Minn.R. 7050 (1990), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) exceeded its statutory authority, adopted rules without complying with rulemaking requirements, and violated constitutional provisions.
FACTS
After the MPCA’s Citizen Board authorized a hearing process on proposed amendments to water quality rules, the MPCA published both the proposed amendments and the requisite notice of hearings. The amendments proposed new…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & IndustryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.