State ex rel. Miller v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Claimant had a very severe weight problem before her injury. It has worsened considerably since. Claimant’s doctor recommends — and the commission’s physician concurs — that claimant enter a supervised weight-loss program. Claimant now asks the commission to authorize and pay for that treatment. Two questions arise: (1) Is the additional allowance of “obesity” a prerequisite for such authorization? and (2) Does the weight-loss treatment recommendation preclude a finding of maximum medical improvement (“MMI”) and thus the denial of temporary total disability compensation? For the reasons to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Dent v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. George v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Hirschbach Motor LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Griffith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Simmons v. Comfort Suites HotelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State ex rel. Jackson Tube Services, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.