Legal Opinion

Olivit v. City and Borough of Juneau

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2007No. S-12216PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2004 the Juneau Empire published an article with this headline: "City faces fifth lawsuit by man who claims harassment." The article was largely about Jake Olivit, Sr. Six months later Olivit sued the Empire, reporter Tony Carroll, the City and Borough of Juneau, and city attorney John Hartle. Olivit's complaint, which implied that the City and Borough of Juneau and Hartle had arranged for the article's publication to retaliate against him, included claims for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Fairbanks Publishing Company v. FranciscoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mullins v. OatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Angleton v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Khalsa v. CHOSEAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wooten v. HintonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API