Legal Opinion

Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2004No. S-11252PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This expedited appeal concerns an initiative proposed by citizens of Girdwood, aimed at preserving much of the lower end of Gird-wood valley as a park. The land is currently owned by the Municipality of Anchorage and has been subject to extensive study and planning, much of it aimed at the development of a private golf course. The Anchorage municipal clerk rejected the initiative petition on the advice of the municipal attorney, who maintained that it would constitute an impermissible appropriation. Alaska Action Center (AAC) appeals the clerk’s decision,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. PEBBLE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. ParnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Stewart v. Advanced Gaming Technologies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API