Legal Opinion

Angleton v. Cox

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2010No. S-12896PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Members of a fraternal organization brought suit against other members asserting claims for breach of a settlement agreement and a derivative action on behalf of the fraternal organization. The superior court dismissed the derivative suit and later granted summary judgment for defendants on the grounds that, because a previous contempt action raising the same claims was dismissed, the damages claims for breach of settlement were barred by res judicata. Because Alaska law does not recognize a derivative right of action for non-profit members, we affirm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Porter v. GalarneauMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jackinsky v. JackinskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ruckle v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Wielechowski v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. McAlpine v. PACARROAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Patterson v. Infinity Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Kiernan v. CreechAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API