Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Oates

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 2008No. S-11623PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Margret Mullins appeals a final judgment of the superior court terminating her rights and interests in three lots of real property located in Tok. Because the superior court did not err in enforcing the settlement agreement that Mullins ultimately breached, we affirm the superior court’s judgment.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

On November 17, 1997, Margret Mullins contracted with Alice Oates to buy three lots of real property located in Tok. 1 The initial contract for sale provided that the purchase price for these properties was $170,000; the down…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jeffries v. Glacier State Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Industrial Commercial Electric, Inc. v. McLeesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Redrock Valley Ranch, LLC v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Chilkoot Lumber Co. v. Rainbow Glacier Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. StensethAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API