Legal Opinion

Walker v. Sieg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1945No. 29646PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was originally commenced by Roy E. Carey, as attorney in fact for Cynthia Walker, against Russell Sieg and Chloie Sieg, his wife, sometime in February, 1943. The purpose of the action was to recover the balance claimed to be due Cynthia Walker from the Siegs upon a promissory note made and executed by Mr. and Mrs. Sieg in favor of W. M. Walker, husband of Cynthia Walker. The note, dated December 1, 1924, is for forty-five hundred dollars. It became due, according to its terms, three years after date and bears interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from date until paid.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Bank of Montreal v. GuseWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Vogt v. HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Tragopan Properties, LLC v. Smith Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Wickwire v. ReardWashington Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API