Tragopan Properties, LLC v. Smith Development, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 The running of the statute of limitations is generally a bar to an action on an unpaid debt. But such an action may be maintained under RCW 4.16.280 by a written acknowledgment or promise signed by the debtor that recognizes the debt’s existence, is communicated to the creditor, and does not indicate an intent not to pay.
¶2 Listing a claim in the schedules of a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code, Title 11 U.S.C., without also stating that the claim is disputed or contingent, is neither an acknowledgment of the debt nor a promise to pay that debt, as provided by RCW 4.16.280. Similarly,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Marriage of BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Osvaldo CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Manchester v. . BraednerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Estate of WimberleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Hope v. Quantum3 Group LLC (In re Seltzer)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
- Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Copper Creek (Marysville) Homeowners Ass'n v. KurtzWashington Supreme Court · 2023
- First American Title Insurance Company v. Northwest Title Company LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.