Legal Opinion

Tragopan Properties, LLC v. Smith Development, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 10, 2011No. 65722-4-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 The running of the statute of limitations is generally a bar to an action on an unpaid debt. But such an action may be maintained under RCW 4.16.280 by a written acknowledgment or promise signed by the debtor that recognizes the debt’s existence, is communicated to the creditor, and does not indicate an intent not to pay.

¶2 Listing a claim in the schedules of a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code, Title 11 U.S.C., without also stating that the claim is disputed or contingent, is neither an acknowledgment of the debt nor a promise to pay that debt, as provided by RCW 4.16.280. Similarly,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re the Marriage of BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Osvaldo CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Manchester v. . BraednerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WimberleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Hope v. Quantum3 Group LLC (In re Seltzer)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  4. Copper Creek (Marysville) Homeowners Ass'n v. KurtzWashington Supreme Court · 2023
  5. First American Title Insurance Company v. Northwest Title Company LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API