Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Gardner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1951No. 31434PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

— The primary question framed by the pleadings is this: Which of two religious organizations was the owner of a certain parcel of Seattle real estate on July 29, 1947?

On that date, the city of Seattle began a condemnation proceeding involving that parcel. A condemnation award in the amount of $7,192.74 was thereafter entered, payable to the rightful owner of the property as of July 29, 1947. This sum was deposited with the county cleric of King county until such owner could be determined.

As the case reaches this court, there are only two parties contesting fpr these funds. One of them is the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Rosenbaum v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Shoemake v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. American Bonding Co. v. LoebWashington Supreme Court · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Edmonds v. John L. Scott Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Tenco, Inc. v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. El Ranco, Inc. v. First National Bank of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API