Legal Opinion

Bank of Montreal v. Guse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1909No. 7540PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December £1, 1907, dismissing an action upon promissory notes, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

— The case is before the court on the plaintiff’s amended complaint and the defendant’s demurrer thereto. The complaint, in substance, is to the effect that the defendant, at Rossland, in the Province of British Columbia, Dominion of Canada, at different times ranging from January-23, 1899, to the 28th of March, 1900, executed notes to different parties, in the aggregate sum of $4,302, which notes were assigned for value to the plaintiff, the different notes being pleaded as separate causes of action. To this complaint a demurrer was interposed, the first ground of the demurrer being that it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Liberman v. GurenskyWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Griffin v. LearWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Walker v. SiegWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Coe v. RoseneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lombardo v. MottolaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API