Legal Opinion
Vogt v. Hovander
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 9, 1980No. 6970-5-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.
The plaintiffs, William and Blanche Vogt, appeal from the trial court's denial of their claim for recovery upon an installment note in a suit against the defendant, Amanda Esther Hovander as administratrix of the estate of Warren Hovander, deceased. The issues raised concern (a) the admissibility (under the deadman's statute) of evidence relating to payments allegedly made upon the note by the decedent, and (b) the effect of certain language in the promissory note.
On March 10, 1978, Mr. and Mrs. Vogt filed suit against Doreen Hovander Quiding, former wife of Warren Hovander, and Amanda Esther…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Ah How v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- King v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Thor v. McDearmidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Erickson v. KERR, MDPS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tacoma Northpark, L.L.C. v. NW, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Tacoma Northpark, LLC v. NW, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.