Legal Opinion

Collier v. Lindley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12714PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This proceeding has arisen out of an endeavor on the part of John Randolph Haynes and his wife, Dora Haynes, to procure a final ruling of the courts upon the validity, in whole or in part, of a certain trust sought to be established by them and each of them under the name of “The John Randolph and Dora Haynes Foundation.” The method employed to secure such ruling is to be found in the terms of a clause in the document whereby said trust was sought to be created and which reads as follows:

“Paragraph Sixteenth: In the event that this instrument does not create a valid, charitable trust, or, if…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Estate of SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Taylor v. HoagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Ballard v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API