Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Cook
California Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1900No. S.F. No. 1336PublishedCited by 53 opinions
APPEAL from an ord'er of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco mating partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The following opinion (prepared by McFarland, J.) was rendered by Department Two in the above-entitled cause. It is now adopted as the decision of the court in Bank:
“This is an appeal by Edwin Wallace Carpenter and William Boerieke from an order of partial distribution to Elisha Y. S. Cook, made December 17, 1897.
“Amasa P. Willey, deceased, made in his lifetime a certain deed of trust to the appellants, Carpenter and Boerieke, dated October 37, 1893, and executed and delivered on the next day. Three days afterward, on October 31, 1893, he made a will, which was properly declared and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Darling v. Rogers & SagoryCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- In re Estate of SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kennedy v. . HoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by53 opinions
- Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Estate of PlumelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Collier v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Estate of BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.