Byers v. Comer
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
-The question for decision is whether or not an assignment of his salary by a public officer of a county before he has earned it is valid as against a garnishing creditor of such officer. This question is here because of the following facts:
William Byers, the judgment debtor, was at the time of this proceeding chairman of the board of supervisors of Yavapai county. On January 31, 1935, for $1 and other valuable considerations, he assigned his official salary due and to become due to the Bank of Arizona and gave to such bank a power of attorney to collect such salary during the rest of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bliss v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- King & King v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. RoseberryArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Dunkley v. City of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Kaminsky v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Pryor v. Pryors, PrintersArizona Supreme Court · 1941