Legal Opinion

Dunkley v. City of Marquette

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1909No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Garnishment proceedings by Joseph Dunkley against the city of Marquette, garnishee defendant of Shields McCarthy, and Elizabeth Kitts, claimant. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by claimant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff against the defendant McCarthy before a justice of the peace of Marquette county. The declaration was on the common counts, and judgment was rendered by said justice in favor of said plaintiff and against said defendant, Shields McCarthy, for the sum of $89.85 damages and $3 costs, on February 26, 1908. On the 29th of February a summons in garnishment was issued to the city of Marquette, and duly served. On the 4th of March, 1908, the said garnishee defendant filed with said justice its written disclosure setting forth that it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Granger v. FrenchMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Alvin R. Durham Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kaminsky v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Anderson v. BranstromMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Byers v. ComerArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Francis v. JoslynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API