Legal Opinion

King & King v. Porter

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1923No. 3590PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

The following is the certificate from the Court of Civil Appeals:

“The above entitled and numbered cause is pending before us on motion for rehearing. The facts are as follows:

“Appellee obtained a judgment against J. F. Arnold for a sum in excess of $100.00. He sued out a garnishment thereon against the First National Bank of Waco. The bank answered that Arnold had on deposit with it the sum of $51.51. Arnold contested this answer, and alleged that the money on deposit with the bank belonged to King & King. King & King intervened, making the same allegation. Upon the trial of the issue thus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Simmang v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. King & King v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Childress v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Baca v. Hoover, Bax, & ShearerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. King King v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Harrisburg Nat. Bank v. Geo. C. Vaughan & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Murray v. BriscoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API