City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
EUBANK, Presiding Judge.
The important substantive question before us in this appeal after a default judgment in a garnishment proceeding is whether a municipality can be held liable as garnishee with respect to any indebtedness other than that payable to its officers and employees as salaries. See A.R.S. § 12-1601. We answer the question in the negative.
All of the following pertinent events took place in 1968. In January, the appellee corporation obtained a judgment in the amount of $5,585.91 against one Stauffer in Cause No. 203379 in the Superior Court of Maricopa County. On May 15,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Willacy County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. AbendrothTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Kansas City v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Tucson v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Bys Inc. v. SmoudiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Martin v. RossiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Smith v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.