Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 29, 1970No. 1 CA-CIV 1065PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

The important substantive question before us in this appeal after a default judgment in a garnishment proceeding is whether a municipality can be held liable as garnishee with respect to any indebtedness other than that payable to its officers and employees as salaries. See A.R.S. § 12-1601. We answer the question in the negative.

All of the following pertinent events took place in 1968. In January, the appellee corporation obtained a judgment in the amount of $5,585.91 against one Stauffer in Cause No. 203379 in the Superior Court of Maricopa County. On May 15,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Willacy County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. AbendrothTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Kansas City v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Bys Inc. v. SmoudiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Martin v. RossiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Smith v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API