State v. Roseberry
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The question involved in these two cases is the constitutionality of a state law providing that the salaries and wages of public officers and employees of the state may be garnished.
II. C. Roseberry, one of the plaintiffs, having obtained a judgment against H. Claridge, an employee of the state at the Industrial School, Ft. Grant, filed in said action the statutory affidavit designating the state as garnishee. The Babbitt-Wyatt case is the same in its facts except that the debtor Babbitt is the state land commissioner, an office created by the legislature.
The state, by the Attorney General,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Phœnix Assurance Co. v. Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Gherna v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. PelosiArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Dennis v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Albrethsen v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.