Legal Opinion
People v. C.B. (In Re C.B.)
California Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 2018No. S237801; S237762PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The California Department of Justice maintains a databank of DNA samples and genetic profiles collected from certain adult and juvenile offenders who have been arrested, convicted, or declared wards of the court. ( Pen. Code, §§ 295 - 300.4.) Juveniles declared wards based on felony conduct must submit samples, but need not do so for most misdemeanor offenses. (§ 296, subd. (a).) The Legislature has also established a procedure to seek destruction of a sample and expungement of a profile from the databank. (§ 299.)
In 2014, the passage of Proposition 47 reclassified various drug and property…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. R.G. (In re R.G.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. K.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. J.M. (In re J.M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.