Legal Opinion

People v. Foster

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2019No. S248046PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Liu, J.

*313*1205The Mentally Disordered Offender Act ( Pen. Code, § 2960 et seq. ) authorizes the Board of Parole Hearings to involuntarily commit individuals convicted of certain felony offenses for mental health treatment as a condition of parole. ( Pen. Code, § 2962 ; all undesignated statutory references are to this code.) Commitment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) may continue even after an offender's parole term has expired, so long as the district attorney makes a showing that the MDO's mental disorder is not in remission **229and that the MDO, because of the disorder, represents a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re BevillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. EsquivelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Myers v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. MancillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API