Legal Opinion

People v. J.M. (In re J.M.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 31, 2019No. A153296; A156093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFujisaki, J.

*1003J.M., a minor, entered into a plea agreement, pursuant to which she admitted a felony charge of torture ( Pen. Code, § 206 ). The juvenile court declared J.M. a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6021 and committed her to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice (also Division of Juvenile Facilities; hereafter DJJ)2 for a maximum term of seven years, with credit for 206 days in custody. On appeal, J.M. contends the juvenile court did not make certain legally required findings and abused its discretion. J.M. also contends…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Lua CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. MunozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. People v. Vallejo CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API