People v. Valenzuela
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
II. DISCUSSION
Our analysis begins with a review of the pertinent statutes and how they have been construed. We then consider their application to this case. We conclude that defendant's street terrorism conviction should have been dismissed in the full resentencing that defendant must receive under Proposition 47.
A. Relevant Statutes and Case Law
1. The Crime of Street Terrorism under Section 186.22, Subdivision (a)
The Legislature originally enacted section 186.22 in 1988 as part of the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act, also known as the "STEP Act." (§ 186.20 et seq.)…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. Amaya CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. BocanegraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.