Legal Opinion

People v. K.P.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 17, 2018No. D074577PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNares, J.

*328*336A jury found K.P. not guilty by reason of insanity after he shot and killed his father. In this appeal, we address whether the recent amendment to subdivision (h) of Penal Code1 section 12022.53, giving a trial court discretion to strike or dismiss a firearm enhancement, applies retroactively to a person-whose case is not yet final-committed to a state hospital after *337being found not guilty by reason of insanity.2 As we shall explain, we conclude that amended section 12022.53 does not apply to an insanity acquittee.

Anticipating this result, K.P. contends that denying an insanity acquittee…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cole v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Cole v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. People v. BarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. People v. BarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. People v. CerdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API