State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village Council
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Huebner must establish that (1) he has a clear legal right to have the charter amendment initiative submitted to the electorate, (2) appellees possess a clear legal duty to provide for certification of the proposed charter amendment to the electorate, and *591(3) Huebner has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. Morris v. Macedonia City Council (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 52, 54, 641 N.E.2d 1075, 1077.
Huebner asserts in his various propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees and failing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Telephone Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Morris v. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Dublin Securities, Inc. v. Ohio Division of SecuritiesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Huebner v. W. Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Committee for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.