Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Paluf v. Feneli

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 93-279PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant in his first proposition of law asserts that the court of appeals erred in granting the writ of quo warranto to Paluf. In order for a writ of quo warranto to issue, a relator must establish (1) that the office is being unlawfully held and exercised by respondent, and (2) that relator is entitled to the office. State ex rel. Delph v. Barr (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 77, 541 N.E.2d 59, syllabus; State ex rel. Randles v. Hill (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 32, 34, 607 N.E.2d 458, 460. .

The court of appeals determined that the Highland Heights Charter provided that the selection of a law director was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Hackley v. EdmondsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State ex rel. Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union, Local 333 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Fattlar v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Minor v. EschenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. E. Cleveland Fire Fighters' Assn., Local 500, IAFF v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API