Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Semik v. Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1993No. 93-1238PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator contended that the special election violated Article X of the Independence City Charter. Article X states that, upon receipt of a petition *335proposing a charter amendment signed by at least ten percent of the registered voters of the city, the council “shall submit such proposed amendment to the electors at the next general or regular municipal election.” The proposed amendment in this case was to be submitted at a special election to be held on August 3, 1993, which was neither a general nor regular municipal election date, in clear violation of the charter. However, Section 9 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bazell v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Ruessman v. FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. GibbonsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Patton v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Morris v. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Becker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API