Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Committee for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2000No. 00-1457Published

1DissentPfeifer, J.

Relators have not established a clear legal right to have the ordinance submitted to the electorate or a corresponding clear legal duty on the part of respondents to do so.

Section 13.2 of the North Ridgeville Charter specifies city council’s authority after its clerk determines that a referendum petition is sufficient:

‘Within thirty (30) days after the enactment by Council, of any ordinance or resolution which may be subject to a referendum under the laws of the State of Ohio, a petition signed by no less than ten percent (10%) of the total electors voting at the last preceding November…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Fattlar v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Dublin Securities, Inc. v. Ohio Division of SecuritiesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary ElectionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API