Legal Opinion

Na-Mor, Inc. v. Roballey

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 12, 1991No. 9129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendants1 appeal from the granting of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The defendants claim that the court improperly found that no genuine issue of material fact existed to preclude the granting of the motion for summary judgment for *216the plaintiff on its complaint and against the defendants on their counterclaim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. In September, 1989, the plaintiff, holder of a $200,000 purchase money second mortgage on real estate consisting of four residential apartment buildings,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cummings & Lockwood v. GrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Gambardella v. KaoudConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Honan v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Cavallaro v. McDonald's Corp., No. Cv97 34 69 87 (Apr. 6, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API