Legal Opinion
Honan v. Greene
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 7, 1995No. 13295PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants1 after the granting of a motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly rendered summary judgment because (1) genuine issues of material fact remained in dispute and (2) the defendants were not entitled to relief as a matter of law because the plaintiff is an aggrieved party as required by General Statutes § 45a-186.2 We agree that the plaintiff is an aggrieved party and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Water & Way Properties v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Scrapchansky v. Town of PlainfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Morris v. CongdonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Ballenger v. Calabrese, No. Cv 93 0113638 (Aug. 16, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Branford Savings Bank v. Charbonneau, No. Cv 92-0329167 (Mar. 10, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Campbell v. Town of Plymouth, No. Cv00501061 (Jun. 6, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Curry v. Dubish, No. 0120728 (Feb. 15, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.