Legal Opinion
Gambardella v. Kaoud
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 4, 1995No. 13219PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The plaintiffs appeal following the trial court’s entry of summary judgment on behalf of the defendants in this personal injury action. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that there were no material facts in dispute and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We agree.
The following facts are taken from the trial court’s memorandum of decision on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff Rosina Gambardella allegedly sustained injuries as the result of a fall on a defective sidewalk. Her husband, James Gambardella, allegedly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Town Bank & Trust Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Doty v. Shawmut BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Battistoni v. Weatherking Products, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- McFarline v. MickensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Abramczyk v. AbbeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cyr v. VKB, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.