Legal Opinion

Catz v. Rubenstein

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 12, 1986No. 12737PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

This is a medical malpractice action commenced June 11, 1982, in which the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that, as a matter of law, the plaintiffs’ suit was barred by the two year statute of limitations provided by General Statutes § 52-584.1 The plaintiffs have appealed, claiming that, even if the defendant’s affidavit and the other documents submitted in support of his motion were credited, there still existed a genuine issue of material fact as to when the plaintiffs’ decedent discovered or in the exercise of reasonable care should have…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API