Legal Opinion

Tri County Apartment Ass'n v. City of Mountain View

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1987No. H002346PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE, J. *

—In this case of first impression, we must decide whether a municipal ordinance restricting the effective date of proposed rental increases is a valid rent control measure or a prohibited trespass into landlord-tenant areas preempted by state law. Our task is to affix a label, with appropriate judicial consequences, to a Mountain View enactment formally identified as a “notification process for rental increases.” Should the measure be classified as permissible control of residential rent increases (the position advocated by the city) or as an usurpation of the notification…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Fisher v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Mobilepark West Homeowners Ass'n v. Escondido Mobilepark WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. William S. Hart Union High School District v. Regional Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Roble Vista Associates v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Channing Properties v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API