Legal Opinion
Mobilepark West Homeowners Ass'n v. Escondido Mobilepark West
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1995No. D019470PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
The trial court granted a judgment on the pleadings, declaring certain ordinances of the City of Escondido (the City) to be facially valid, in the City’s complaint in intervention in an underlying action between plaintiff Mobilepark West Homeowners Association (the residents) against their landlord, Escondido Mobilepark West and Charles E. Jacobson (the owners). The owners have appealed this judgment on the pleadings, contending that the ordinances (Nos. 91-19 & 88-50), which the City characterizes as clarification and implementation of a voter initiative measure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Murphy v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.