Legal Opinion

Channing Properties v. City of Berkeley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1992No. A053695PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

Channing Properties appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the City of Berkeley and City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board in an action regarding the city’s laws regulating the removal of housing from the residential rental market. It claims the judgment must be reversed because state law preempts the local laws in question.

Statement of the Case and Facts

Appellant Channing Properties is the owner of rental property in the City of Berkeley (the City) consisting of 33 residential units. On June 29, 1989, appellant filed a complaint for declaratory relief as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. L.A Lincoln Place Invr's, LTD. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Coyne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Johnson v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. San Francisco Apartment Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Tom v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API