Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hauck
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, John W. Hauck of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0023153, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1978. In February 2010, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a complaint charging respondent with failing to maintain client funds in a separate, interest bearing trust account, failing to maintain adequate records of client funds in his possession, commingling client funds with his own, and failing to notify his clients that he did not carry malpractice insurance.
{¶ 2} The parties have submitted stipulations of fact and misconduct, and a panel of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BeelerOhio Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Dull (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Cincinnati Bar Association v. HauckOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Akron Bar Association v. Parkin.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Disciplinary Counsel v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 2012