Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, P. Robert Broeren Jr. of Mount Vernon, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0069166, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1998.
{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now suspend respondent’s license to practice for six months based on findings that he neglected a client’s case, attempted to cover up the neglect, failed to return the client’s file on request, and failed to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation. Respondent objects to the board’s report, disputing the findings of neglect and dishonesty, urging us to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Disciplinary Counsel v. StollingsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by295 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Counsel v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KraemerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. ParisiOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2011
290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.