Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Association v. Parkin.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2018No. 2018-0542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*597 {¶ 1} Respondent, Tamara Dawn Parkin, of Akron, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0082454, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2007.

{¶ 2} In a July 2017 amended complaint, relator, Akron Bar Association, charged Parkin with committing ethical violations during her representation of eight separate clients. After a hearing, a three-member panel of the Board of Professional Conduct found that Parkin engaged in some of the charged misconduct, dismissed many of the alleged rule violations, and recommended that we suspend her from the practice of law for one year, order her to pay…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. LarsonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. MalynnOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Akron Bar Association v. BednarskiOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HauckOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Akron Bar Assn. v. ParkinOhio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. TregreOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API