Hoffman-Marks Co. v. Spires
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Curtis- D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Three of the four actions involved in these appeals were commenced to foreclose mechanics’ liens upon a lot and building in the city of Los Angeles. Mary H. Spires, the owner of the property, answered the complaints in said actions, and commenced, as plaintiff, a separate action against all of the lien claimants and the original contractors. In this action she prayed for a decree adjudging that none of the claimants was entitled to any lien against her property, and that there was no fund in her hands for the payment of the laborers or materialmen. The four actions were consolidated and tried…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hampton v. ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McDonald v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Butler v. Ng ChungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Marshall v. Vallejo Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.