McDonald v. Hayes
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES,C.
—Action to foreclose mechanic’s liens in favor of the several plaintiffs, who had judgment foreclosing each of their several hens, and defendants.Esther Attell and Seymour Attell appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. Hayes did not answer.
Esther Attell is, and was, the owner of a house and lot in the city of San Francisco, and on November 21, 1896, entered into a written contract with defendant Hayes to make certain alterations and repairs upon the building upon said lot. This contract was duly' recorded before the work was commenced, and no question is made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Walsh v. McMenomyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hoffman-Marks Co. v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Clark v. BeyrleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Steiger Terra Cotta & Pottery Works v. City of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.