Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Vallejo Commercial Bank
California Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1912No. Sac. No. 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff in his own right, and as assignee of the Coast Electric Company and of J. W. Mitchell, brought this action to foreclose three mechanics’ liens upon the property of defendant Vallejo Commercial Bank in the city of Vallejo.
On the nineteenth day of August, 1907, the Vallejo Commerr cial Bank, as owner, entered into a written contract with Newton-Sandford Construction Company, as contractor, for the making of certain alterations and additions to a brick building owned by the bank. The contract price was $13,800. The validity of the contract, although questioned by the complaint, was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoffman-Marks Co. v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- McLaughlin v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Palmer v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hubbell, Hall & Randall Co. v. PentecostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.