G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. Weinsveig
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
G. Ganahl Lumber Company, Frick-Fleming Hardware Company, O. F. Pealer, and five others instituted actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens upon a lot and building owned by the defendant Weinsveig. The building had been partially constructed under a contract between Weinsveig, as owner, and one Reeve, as contractor. Reeve abandoned his contract and the building was completed by Weinsveig. The actions were consolidated. The judgment of the court was that three of the lien claimants, to wit, G. Ganahl Lumber Company, Frick-Fleming Hardware Company, and Pealer were not, and that the other five…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hoffman-Marks Co. v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Muchenberger v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.