Legal Opinion

Butler v. Ng Chung

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1911No. S.F. No. 5305PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. James M. Trontt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Action to foreclose liens of materialmen and sub-contractors. The court gave the plaintiff, as assignee of the original claimants, a judgment against the owners for $2988.40, with interest, and also for the foreclosure of a lien upon the property for said amount. The said owners appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The complaint is in six counts, each setting up the claim of one of plaintiff’s assignors. The plaintiff alleged the due execution and filing of a written contract between the appellants, as owners, and the defendants Jordan &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Humboldt Lumber Mill Co. v. CrispCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. A-1 Door & Materials Co. v. Fresno Guarantee Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API