Legal Opinion

State v. Maizeroi

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 30, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Teddy Maizeroi appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Atwood, J.) following a jury verdict of guilty on one count of gross sexual assault. 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(A) (Class A). 1 The jury returned a verdict of not guilty for Maizeroi on a second charge of unlawful sexual contact. 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(H) (Class C). 2 Maizeroi contends (a) that the trial court improperly instructed the jury regarding what constitutes compulsion; (b) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the victim had no duty to resist Maiz-eroi; (c) that there was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ArdolinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. Dumond v. Aroostook Van LinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. State v. SnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AbodaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. McKeeman v. Cianbro Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  3. Town of Ogunquit v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. State v. ParsonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. State v. RackliffeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API