Dumond v. Aroostook Van Lines
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Gerald Dumond appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting his employer’s petition for review and Du-mond’s petition for permanent impairment benefits. Dumond raises two issues. He first contends that the Board’s determination of decreased incapacity was not based on competent evidence. He also contends that it was error for the Board to award five weeks of benefits for his 1990 injury, one week of benefits for each of the five percentage points of permanent incapacity attributable to that injury. 39 M.R.S.A. § 56-B(1)(A) (1989). Dumond argues that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Poitras v. R. E. Glidden Body Shop, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Campbell v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Tripp v. Philips Elmet Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Adams v. Mt. Blue Health CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Morse v. Fleet Financial GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.