Legal Opinion

State v. Aboda

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 30, 2010No. Docket: Cum-09-523PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] Police Aboda appeals from a judgment of conviction of gross sexual assault (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 253(1)(A) (2009), entered on the Unified Criminal Docket (Cumberland County, MG Kennedy, J.) after a jury trial. The State offered evidence that Aboda, with another man, forced a woman to submit to sex with Aboda as a result of compulsion. Aboda argues that the law’s definition of “compulsion” is internally inconsistent and unconstitutionally vague because the statute allows for a finding of compulsion when the alleged victim is “unable to physically repel the actor,” see 17-A M.R.S. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Mahaney v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. State v. ThongsavanhSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. State v. WithamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. State v. HoflandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. State of Maine v. David ReckardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. Cookson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. State v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API