Legal Opinion

State v. Rackliffe

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 27, 2010No. Docket: And-10-39PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Rodney C. Rackliffe appeals from a judgment of conviction of one count of gross sexual assault (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 253(1)(A) (2009), entered on a jury’s verdict in the Superior Court (An-droscoggin County, Delahanty, J.). Rack-liffe argues that the court: (1) committed error and violated his constitutional rights when it excluded evidence of the male victim’s sexual orientation pursuant to M.R. Evid. 412; and (2) erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational juror would have to entertain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. State v. RosaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. State v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. State v. HarperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. State v. MooresSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. AbodaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API