Legal Opinion
McKeeman v. Cianbro Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 27, 2002No. Cum-01-539PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] Sharon McKeeman appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) determining the amount of workers’ compensation death benefits that she must repay to S.D. Warren Company as a result of her settlement with a third party. Sharon contends that the court erred in calculating S.D. Warren’s proportionate share of the costs of her recovery. We vacate the judgment and remand for further findings.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] The parties stipulated to the following facts. In 1996, Fred McKeeman was an employee of S.D. Warren Company when he died in a work-related accident.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ruediger v. Kallmeyer Brothers ServiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- City of Austin v. JanowskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hunter v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Zuber v. Illinois Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Kilroy v. Northeast Sunspaces, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Despres v. MoyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Estate of Gregory Sullwold v. The Salvation ArmySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.